Introduction of a rapid response system: why we are glad we MET

cc4841 CCJ Commentary Introduction of a rapid response system: why we are glad we MET Jones Daryl Bellomo Rinaldo rinaldo.bellomo@austin.org.au

Department of Intensive Care (Monash University), Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Australia

Department of Intensive Care and Department of Surgery (Melbourne University), Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Critical Care 1364-8535 2006 10 1 121 http://ccforum.com/content/10/1/121 1654247710.1186/cc4841 15 2 2006 2006 BioMed Central Ltd

Abstract

Hospital patients can experience serious adverse events during their stay. To identify, review and treat these patients and to prevent serious adverse events, we introduced a medical emergency team (MET) service into our hospital in September 2000 following a 1-year period of preparation and education. The introduction of the MET into our institution has been associated with profound changes to cultural and medical practice that have affected the way in which the intensive care unit and the hospital view the roles of junior doctors, nurses, intensive care physicians, and senior doctors. These changes have also been associated with a progressive reduction in the incidence of cardiac arrests of close to 70%. Furthermore, they have allowed improved analysis and characterization of 'at-risk' patients and their needs. Four years later, we remain glad we MET.

Introduction

Studies conducted in multiple countries have revealed that 15–20% of hospitalized patients develop serious adverse events 123. Up to 80% of adverse events are preceded by physiological and biochemical derangements that occur over hours and sometimes days 456. Despite these observations, not all hospitals have a systematic approach to the identification, review and rapid treatment of such patients. These patients suffer mortality rates that are greater than those in patients with myocardial infarction. However, the latter are identified within minutes of presentation, are managed using evidence-based algorithms and have dedicated units, nurses and doctors. The former typically receive unpredictable and unstructured care. We argued in our hospital that as an issue of clinical governance it was necessary to develop a method of identifying and treating patients at risk – the medical emergency team (MET) service.

The concept of the MET

As described previously 7, the MET system can be activated by any member of ward staff when patients develop predefined alterations in heart rate, blood pressure or respiratory rate, or when – for whatever reason – a member of staff feels worried about the patient. Immediate patient review in our hospital is then performed by a team led by an intensive care fellow with an intensive care nurse. The theory behind the MET is that early intervention during clinical deterioration is associated with improved outcome. This observation has been made for the management of trauma 8, acute myocardial infarction 9 and septic shock 10 presenting to the emergency department.

Sustaining the success of the MET service at the Austin Hospital

The MET service was introduced into the Austin Hospital in September 2000 and was shown to be associated with a 56% relative risk reduction for cardiac arrests 11 and a 36% relative risk reduction for surgical deaths 12.

In the 4 years following the introduction of the MET, there has been a progressive reduction in cardiac arrests 13. This reduction has been associated with a progressive increase in the number of MET calls/1000 patients admitted to the hospital. Our findings also suggested a 'dose effect'. We believe that the sustained success of the MET at our hospital is due to a number of important factors (Table 1).

Table 1

Important components of the success of the MET service at The Austin Hospital

Collection of baseline data for before-and-after studies

Obtaining support from administrators and heads of departments

Detailed education and preparation for 1 year before introducing the MET service

Repeated education of new and existing hospital staff

Administering questionnaires to assess staff attitudes and obstacles to MET use

Assessing the circadian pattern of MET activations and cardiac arrests

Ongoing audit of effectiveness of the MET

Feeding back effectiveness to hospital staff at regular meetings

Assessment of the common causes of MET syndromes

Educating ICU fellows about an approach to managing a MET call

ICU, intensive care unit; MET, medical emergency team.

How the MET changed hospital culture

Setting the scene for the introduction of the MET service

Before the MET service was introduced into the Austin Hospital, a 1-year campaign of preparation and education was undertaken. During this period, 'political' support was obtained for its introduction. In addition, detailed and repeated education was delivered to all nursing and medical staff to advise them of the pending introduction, clinical rationale and method of activation. It was emphasized that the MET service was hospital policy and that no member of staff could be criticized for calling the MET. It was also emphasized that the MET system would not and could not represent an attempt by intensive care unit (ICU) doctors to take over patient management. Instead, the MET service aimed to provide an acute second opinion within minutes and to offer resuscitation expertise that would form part of patient co-management during a crisis.

How the MET has changed the culture of managing acutely unwell hospital patients

Uptake of the MET service in the Austin Hospital has been progressive from 25 calls/month in 2000 to over 100/month in December 2005. The current call rate (>40 calls/1000 admissions per month) is five times that seen in the Medical Emergency Response Improvement Team (MERIT) study 14. These observations suggest that sustained uptake of the MET system is possible but that increased utilization may take several years to develop.

We recently surveyed 350 ward nurses to assess their understanding and attitudes toward the MET service (unpublished data). We found that the nurses understood the concepts of the MET and appreciated its presence. The vast majority felt that the MET increased their ability to manage acutely unwell patients.

Analysis of the circadian variation of activation of the MET service revealed that the majority of calls occurred during nursing handover, with a peak at 8:00–8:30 hours 15. These observations reinforce previously reported opinion 7 that adequately trained doctors must be available 24 hours per day.

Recently, we completed an audit of 400 MET calls to identify the most common clinical triggers 16. In keeping with previously reported opinion 17, these data have allowed us to identify some 'MET syndromes'.

How the MET has changed our intensive care unit

The introduction of the MET service has changed the profile of the ICU within the hospital. ICU doctors and nurses are no longer viewed as simply managing critically ill patients within the confines of the ICU ('the ivory tower'). Instead, they are seen in the hospital wards assessing and treating patients in the early phases of clinical deterioration. This paradigm shift has been associated with an improvement in the interaction between the ICU and all other departments of the hospital.

The MET service has allowed the ICU to work closely with the Clinical Governance Department to identify system problems in the management of unwell ward patients, assess these problems by root cause analysis, and develop strategies to prevent them.

Future direction for the MET service

Considerable interest in 'rapid response systems' such as the MET service has developed in both the USA 18 and the UK 19. At our institution, future development of the MET service will probably concentrate on further developing and characterizing MET syndromes and validating education methods for ICU fellows. Finally, in characterizing the epidemiology and outcome of nearly 2500 MET calls and 300 cardiac arrests, we hope to increase our ability to introduce further preventative strategies to protect at-risk patients.

Conclusion

The introduction of a MET service into our hospital has changed the culture of the hospital itself and the ICU. The latter has come to recognize that the task of intensive care medicine is to prevent critical illness within the hospital just as much as treating it effectively when such illness presents to its door. Through the MET service, collaboration between the ICU and other units has increased. Many physicians and ward charge nurses frequently remark that it seems inconceivable that not so long ago our hospital existed without a MET and wonder why the MET system had not been introduced 30 years ago.

Abbreviations

ICU = intensive care unit; MERIT = Medical Emergency Response Improvement Team; MET = medical emergency team.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

The quality of health care delivery to adults in the United States McGlynn EA Asch SM Adams J Keesey J Hicks J DeCristofaro A Kerr EA N Engl J Med 2003 348 2635 2645 10.1056/NEJMsa022615 12826639 Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalised patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I Brennan TA Leape LL Laird N Hebert L Localio AR Lawthers AG Newhouse JP Weiler PC Hiatt HH N Engl J Med 1991 324 370 376 1987460 The quality in Australian health care study Wilson RM Runciman WB Gibberd RW Harrison BT Newby L Hamilton JD Med J Aust 1995 163 458 471 7476634 Developing strategies to prevent in-hospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event Franklin C Mathew J Crit Care Med 1994 22 244 247 8306682 Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests Shein RMH Hazday N Pena M Ruben BH Sprung CL Chest 1990 98 1388 1392 2245680 A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests, deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom: The ACADEMIA study Kause J Smith G Prytherch D Parr M Flabouris A Hillman KM Resuscitation 2004 62 275 282 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.05.016 15325446 The medical emergency team Lee A Bishop G Hillman KM Daffurn K Anaesth Intens Care 1995 23 183 186 Impact of an integrated treatment approach to the severley injured patients (ISS > 16) on hospital mortality and quality of care Nardi G Riccioni L Cerchiari E De Blasio E Gristina G Oransky M Pallotta F Ajmone-Cat C Freni C Trombetta S Minerva Anesthesiol 2002 68 25 35 Very early assessment of risk for in-hospital death among 11,483 patients with acute myocardial infarction. GISSI investigators Fresco C Carinci F Maggioni AP Ciampi A Nicolucci A Santoro E Tavazzi L Tognonia G Am Heart J 1999 138 1058 1064 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70070-0 10577435 Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock Rivers E Nguyen B Havstad S Ressler J Muzzin A Knoblich B Peterson E Tomlanovich M Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group N Engl J Med 2001 345 1368 1377 10.1056/NEJMoa010307 11794169 A prospective before-and-after trial of a medical emergency team Bellomo R Goldsmith D Uchino S Buckmaster J Hart GK Opdam H Silvester W Doolan L Gutteridge G Med J Aust 2003 179 283 287 12964909 Prospective controlled trial of effect of medical emergency team on postoperative morbidity and mortality rates Bellomo R Goldsmith D Uchino S Buckmaster J Hart G Opdam H Silvester W Doolan L Gutteridge G Crit Care Med 2004 32 916 921 10.1097/01.CCM.0000119428.02968.9E 15071378 Long term effect of a medical emergency team on cardiac arrests in a teaching hospital Jones D Bellomo R Bates S Warrillow S Goldsmith D Hart G Opdam H Gutteridge G Crit Care 2005 9 R808 R815 10.1186/cc3906 16356230 MERIT study investigators. Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial Hillman K Chen J Cretikos M Bellomo R Brown D Doig G Finfer S Flabouris A MERIT study investigators Lancet 2005 365 2091 2097 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66733-5 15964445 Circadian pattern of activation of the medical emergency team in a teaching hospital Jones D Bates S Warrillow S Opdam H Goldsmith D Gutteridge G Bellomo R Crit Care 2005 9 R303 R306 1269438 16137341 10.1186/cc3537 MET syndromes and an approach to their management Jones D Duke G Green J Briedis J Bellomo R Casamento A Kattula A Way M Crit Care 2006 Medical emergency teams: deciphering clues to crises in hospitals DeVita M Crit Care 2005 9 325 326 1269447 16137372 10.1186/cc3721 Establish a rapid response team Institute of Health Improvement http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/CriticalCare/IntensiveCare/Changes/EstablishaRapidResponseTeam.htm Progress in developing services: critical care outreach 2003 NHS Modernisation Agency http://www.modern.nhs.uk/criticalcare/5021/7117/78001-DoH-CareOutreach.pdf