Skip to main content

Volume 16 Supplement 3

Sepsis 2012

  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Audit of the ward-based management of severe sepsis in a large teaching hospital

Background

The Surviving Sepsis 6-hour bundle [1] was created to promote effective identification and management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Efficient and timely implementation of the 6-hour bundle including early intravenous antibiotics has been shown to improve patient outcome [2]. We aimed to determine the efficiency of severe sepsis identification, implementation of the 6-hour bundle and overall management of ward-based patients.

Methods

During a 4-month period, ward-based patients with severe sepsis were identified by nurse practitioners and the critical care outreach team at a large teaching hospital in North West England. Analysis of patient medical records was performed to assess the efficiency and quality of care received compared with the gold standard sepsis 6-hour bundle. Promptness of doctor attendance and patient 30-day outcome were also analysed.

Results

Twenty-eight patients with severe sepsis were identified and analysed. Suspicion of sepsis was documented in medical records for all patients; however, the 6-hour sepsis bundle was completed in only one case. Appropriate i.v. antibiotics were prescribed to all patients. Median duration from the documented onset of severe sepsis (time 0) until review by a doctor was 90 minutes (0 to 19 hours). The median Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), determined from patients' vital signs, at documented onset of severe sepsis was 3.5 (1 to 9) with a subsequent increase of median MEWS to 4 by the time of doctors' first attendance. The 30-day patient outcome showed 13 patients discharged home and seven patients deceased. Comparison of deceased patients with patients who were discharged alive (see Table 1) demonstrated an increased median duration from time 0 until doctor attendance in the deceased group. However, interestingly, timely antibiotics (given within 1 hour of patient assessment by a doctor) were administered with greater frequency in the deceased patient group.

Table 1 Characteristics and management data for patients with severe sepsis comparing patients who were deceased with patients discharged home at 30 days

Conclusion

Despite the widespread recognition of patients with severe sepsis, underperformance of the 6-hour bundle remains a major factor in suboptimal management of ward-based patients. Increased delay from the onset of severe sepsis until doctor review is associated with increased risk of mortality despite better adherence to the 6-hour bundle. Further education of doctors and nursing staff, regarding the importance of the 6-hour sepsis bundle, in addition to the implementation of strategies to improve the early identification and timely review of ward-based patients with severe sepsis are recommended.

References

  1. Dellinger RP, et al.: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34: 17-60. 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar A, et al.: Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 1589-1596. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Olivia O'Gara and Jonathan Walker are contributing authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Estebanez, G., Cole, M. Audit of the ward-based management of severe sepsis in a large teaching hospital. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 3), P76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11763

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11763

Keywords