Skip to main content
  • Commentary
  • Published:

Recombinant human activated protein C in acute lung injury: what is the role of bronchial circulation?

Abstract

Impairment of the protein C pathway plays a central role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Treatment with recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) has been reported to increase survival from severe sepsis. Protein C levels also decrease markedly in acute lung injury, of both septic and nonseptic origin. Low levels of protein C in acute lung injury are associated with poor clinical outcome. The present article discusses the beneficial effects of rhAPC in oleic acid-induced lung injury as well as the controversies between different animal models and the timing of drug administration. The unique bronchial circulation in ovine models seems to be responsible for the beneficial effects of rhAPC when given simultaneously to the injury.

In the previous issue of Critical Care we read with great interest a report of the first experimental study of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) in oleic acid-induced nonseptic acute lung injury (ALI) in sheep [1].

Impairment of the protein C pathway plays a central role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Treatment with rhAPC has been reported to increase survival from severe sepsis [2]. The administration of rhAPC may correct the dysregulated anticoagulant mechanism and prevent propagation of thrombin generation and the formation of microvascular thrombosis. Furthermore, rhAPC may simultaneously modulate the inflammatory response. It is likely that the beneficial effects of rhAPC observed in experimental and clinical studies of severe sepsis result from a combination of mechanisms that modulate the interdependent processes of coagulation and inflammation [3]. Protein C levels also decrease markedly in ALI, of both septic and nonseptic origin. Low levels of protein C in ALI are associated with poor clinical outcome [4, 5].

In the present study, the authors of the well known group of Lars Bjertnaes (Tromsø, Norway) showed that simultaneous administration of rhAPC ameliorates oleic acid-induced (non-septic) lung injury. The rise in pulmonary artery pressure, the development of pulmonary edema and the derangement of arterial oxygenation subsequent to intravenous bolus infusion of oleic acid all improved significantly during coadministration of rhAPC [1]. These results are surprising, given the timing of rhAPC administration.

We recently reviewed studies of rhAPC treatment in sepsis-related ALI and found the timing of drug administration to be critical in these experiments [6]. When given prior to the injury in a porcine model [7] or given simultaneously in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced lung injury in rats [8], the oxygenation further deteriorated – beneficial effects could only be shown when rhAPC was given post injury in various ovine models [9–11]. We hypothesized that rhAPC in the early stage of ALI may disturb the complex coagulation balance at the alveolar level, and may impede an initially positive effect of coagulation activation, because in the early phase of ALI the epithelial side as well as the endothelial side of the capillary barrier are involved with fibrin deposition, reflecting a shift in the alveolar/fibrinolysis balance [6].

The beneficial effects of the simultaneous treatment in the present study [1], however, are in contrast to our hypothesis and lead away from the coagulation cascade to the activity of neutrophils in ALI. During inflammation, activated neutrophils accumulate in the lungs and other organs, thus contributing to organ system dysfunction. Neutrophils express receptors for rhAPC and neutrophil chemotaxis is inhibited by exposure to rhAPC, explaining its beneficial effects [12].

Our group uses an ovine model of smoke inhalation and sepsis to induce ALI [13], since smoke inhalation and sepsis are major contributors to mortality in burn patients [14]. The lungs of sheep have a special feature, a single bronchial artery, and a single lymphatic draining of the lung. A 10-fold increase in bronchial blood flow could be shown within 20 minutes of smoke inhalation. These same animals demonstrate a six-fold increase in pulmonary transvascular fluid flux [13]. The venous outflow of the bronchial circulation drains into the pulmonary microcirculation at the precapillary level. Considering the fact that initial damage to the airway appeared to drive the pathophysiology of the parenchyma, investigators hypothesized that the bronchial blood might deliver cytotoxic materials or cells into the pulmonary microcirculation. To test this hypothesis, several investigators have tied off the bronchial artery of sheep and then exposed the animals to smoke. In these studies the hypothesis was affirmed, and the lung parenchymal changes were reduced [15].

What could be the linkage between the airway, the bronchial venous drainage and parenchymal injury to the lung? Neutrophils activated in the bronchial circulation flow out into the bronchial venous drainage. Normally, the large neutrophil can traverse the pulmonary capillary by changing shape. Many of the neutrophils, however, have been activated in the bronchial areas – their F-actin is activated and the cells are stiff and cannot deform. These stiff cells are carried to the pulmonary microvasculature, where they are impaled by the narrow pulmonary capillaries. The activated neutrophils release reactive oxygen species and proteases that damage the parenchyma [15]. The final proof of this hypothesis was to deplete the animals of their neutrophils and determine how this affected the response to inhalation injury. In these studies of sheep depleted of their leukocytes, a high percentage of the response to smoke inhalation was blocked [16].

Neutrophils express receptors for rhAPC and neutrophil chemotaxis is inhibited by exposure to rhAPC [12]. When rhAPC binds to these receptors, before the cells are drained via the bronchial venous system into the pulmonary microvasculature, a reduction of ALI may be anticipated. Taking these facts together, the results of Waerhaug and colleagues appear in a different light [1]; of course oleic acid-induced ALI is different from smoke inhalation, but, given the direct injury to the lung and the fact that sheep have the single bronchial artery [13], the beneficial effects of a simultaneous treatment with rhAPC might be more advantageous than in other models – especially since only sheep subjected to peritoneal sepsis or endotoxin infusion presented with reduced extravascular lung water [10, 11]. Future studies are warranted to determine the effects of rhAPC in an ovine model when the bronchial artery is tied off to clear its mechanism in ALI.

Abbreviations

ALI:

acute lung injury

rhAPC:

recombinant human activated protein C.

References

  1. Waerhaug K, Kirov MY, Kuzkov VV, Kuklin VN, Bjertnaes LJ: Recombinant human activated protein C ameliorates oleic acid-induced lung injury in awake sheep. Crit Care. 2008, 12: R146-10.1186/cc7128.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, Steingrub JS, Garber GE, Helterbrand JD, Ely EW, Fisher CJ, Recombinant human protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study group: Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 699-709. 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levi M, Poll van der T: Recombinant human activated protein C: current insights into its mechanism of action. Crit Care. 2007, 11 (Suppl 5): S3-10.1186/cc6154.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shorr AF, Bernard GR, Dhainaut JF, Russell JR, Macias WL, Nelson DR, Sundin DP: Protein C concentrations in severe sepsis: an early directional change in plasma levels predicts outcome. Crit Care. 2006, 10: R92-10.1186/cc4946.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matthay MA, Ware LB: Plasma protein C levels in patients with acute lung injury: prognostic significance. Crit Care Med. 2004, 32 (5 Suppl): S229-S232. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000126121.56990.D3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Velik-Salchner C, Wenzel V, Maybauer DM, Maybauer MO: Recombinant human activated protein C in experimental models of acute lung injury: the timing is critical!. Intensive Care Med. 2007, 33: 2048-2050. 10.1007/s00134-007-0783-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Richard JC, Bregeon F, Leray V, Le Bars D, Costes N, Tourvieille C, Lavenne F, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Gimenez G, Guerin C: Effect of activated protein C on pulmonary blood flow and cytokine production in experimental acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2007, 33: 2199-2206. 10.1007/s00134-007-0782-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robriquet L, Collet F, Tournoys A, Prangere T, Neviere R, Fourrier F, Guery BP: Intravenous administration of activated protein C in Pseudomonas-induced lung injury: impact on lung fluid balance and the inflammatory response. Respir Res. 2006, 7: 41-10.1186/1465-9921-7-41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maybauer MO, Maybauer DM, Fraser JF, Traber LD, Westphal M, Enkhbaatar P, Cox RA, Huda R, Hawkins HK, Morita N, Murakami K, Mizutani A, Herndon DN, Traber DL: Recombinant human activated protein C improves pulmonary function in ovine acute lung injury resulting from smoke inhalation and sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34: 2432-2438. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000230384.61350.FA.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Waerhaug K, Kuklin VN, Kirov MY, Sovershaev MA, Langbakk B, Ingebretsen OC, Ytrehus K, Bjertnaes LJ: Recombinant human activated protein C attenuates endotoxin-induced lung injury in awake sheep. Crit Care. 2008, 12: R104-10.1186/cc6985.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Z, Su F, Rogiers P, Vincent JL: Beneficial effects of recombinant human activated protein C in a ewe model of septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35: 2594-2600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sturn DH, Kaneider NC, Feistritzer C, Djanani A, Fukudome K, Wiedermann CJ: Expression and function of the endothelial protein C receptor in human neutrophils. Blood. 2003, 102: 1499-1505. 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Traber DL, Maybauer MO, Maybauer DM, Westphal M, Traber LD: Inhalational and acute lung injury. Shock. 2005, 24 (Suppl 1): 82-87. 10.1097/01.shk.0000191338.39154.73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maybauer MO, Maybauer DM, Herndon DN: Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 416-417. 10.1056/NEJMc053159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Traber DL, Hawkins HK, Enkhbaatar P, Cox RA, Schmalstieg FC, Zwischenberger JB, Traber LD: The role of the bronchial circulation in the acute lung injury resulting from burn and smoke inhalation. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2007, 20: 163-166. 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.12.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Basadre JO, Sugi K, Traber DL, Traber LD, Niehaus GD, Herndon DN: The effect of leukocyte depletion on smoke inhalation injury in sheep. Surgery. 1988, 104: 208-215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel L Traber.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maybauer, M.O., Traber, D.L. & Maybauer, D.M. Recombinant human activated protein C in acute lung injury: what is the role of bronchial circulation?. Crit Care 13, 112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7155

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7155

Keywords